
position of retouch
The following terms are used to define where retouch is found,
or to indicate the position of the retouch, with regard to the
surfaces of a flake, blade or microblade: these are direct retouch
position, inverse retouch position, alternate retouch position,
alternating retouch position, bifacial retouch position and invasive
retouch position. These terms are used by Tixier
1974, 14, 15, 3, 4 and 21) Tixier,
Inizan and Roche 1980, fig.41 and p. 87, 100) and Brézillon
1977, fig. 20 and p.110-111). Another set of terms are used
to describe the type, morphology and technology of retouch.
See retouch types
direct retouch
Direct retouch position has been defined as "retouch in which
the...removals start from the ventral or bulbar surface. Also
called normal retouch" (Tixier
1974, 14). It is called normal retouch as it is the most common
retouch found and is the easiest to apply - the knapper works
from the ventral surface, which forms a flat striking platform,
onto the convex dorsal surface. As illustrated it can only be
seen from the dorsal surface and leaves no traces on the ventral
face.
indexinverse retouch
Inverse retouch position is the opposite of direct retouch position
in that it is formed "when removals start from the dorsal
surface" (Tixier 1974,
15). It is more difficult to apply than direct retouch in that
the knapper must work from a convex surface on to a flat surface.
No traces of it can not be seen from the dorsal face - it is only
visible from the ventral surface.
indexalternate retouch
Alternate retouch position is "retouch which is worked along
part or all of both edges of a piece, starting from the dorsal
surface on one edge and from the ventral surface on the other
edge" (Tixier 1974, 3).
It can also be described as a combination of the use of direct
retouch position along one edge of a blank and inverse retouch
position along the other edge.
indexalternating retouch
The term alternating retouch position was introduced by Bordes
1961, 29 to describe the retouch found on a group of side
scrapers. It has been defined by Tixier
1974, 3 as "retouch which starts alternately from one
surface then from the other on the same edge of a flake, blade
or bladelet. When identifying this retouch it is essential to
assure that it is consistently regular and continuous. As Bordes 1961, 45 warns, this is
the most common form of ´retouch´ to be found on pseudo-tools.
Strips of edge damage also often appear to alternate from one
side of an artifact to the other.
indexbifacial retouch
Bifacial retouch position is produced when direct retouch and
inverse retouch are applied along the same section of the same
edge of an artifact (in opposition to alternate retouch, where
this combination is found along opposite edges). It has been defined
by Tixier 1974, 4 as "retouch
worked on both surfaces of an object, covering each surface partially
or totally." It is possible to ascertain the last surface
to be worked by determining which set of retouch scars are complete
and which set are cut by these detachments.
indexinvasive retouch
Invasive retouch position is the term used to describe the application
of retouch that covers most, or all, of an artifact. In the lower
Palaeolithic handaxes are produced with invasive bifacial retouch
using direct percussion. In later periods invasive retouch is
often achieved by using the long flake removals of parallel retouch
and/or sub-parallel retouch, which are thought to be applied by
pressure flaking. It differs from other retouch positioning in
that it is applied with the purpose of shaping the entire artifact
- others are restricted to modifying the edges. Invasive retouch
can be applied unifacially, bifacially or can be limited to selected
areas of an artifact.
index
index